Navigating the Uncertainty: The Future of Mandatory GHG Reporting in Light of Recent EPA Announcements

Environmental ConsultingEnvironmental Consulting
03/14/2025
Share it with the world!

In the wake of this week’s announcement by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) touting the “biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history,” many companies are left with pressing questions regarding the status of the mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) and the implications for the 2024 reporting year (RY2024). With reports due on March 31, 2025, organizations are seeking clarity amidst evolving regulatory signals.

What We Know So Far

The EPA’s press release broadly references a reconsideration of the GHGRP, citing significant costs imposed on the American energy supply. However, the agency has also released two related fact sheets offering more insight into its intended focus areas. According to these documents, the primary target of this regulatory review appears to be focused on the recent amendments to Part 98 from April and May 2024.

The fact sheets suggest that the Administration aims to reduce the burden on the oil and gas sector by revising Subpart W and potentially streamlining reporting requirements across other sectors. Despite these potential changes, 40 CFR Part 98 remains in effect for now.

Adding to the uncertainty, the e-GGRT reporting platform has been down since late January, and on March 7, the EPA indicated that clarifying guidance will be forthcoming. Given these delays, it seems increasingly unlikely that e-GGRT will be operational in time for the March 31 deadline. While there have been rumors circulating of a 30-day extension, EPA has not published an official announcement as of yet.

What Should Companies Do If e-GGRT Is Unavailable?

Under 40 CFR 98.5, GHG reports and certificates of representation must be submitted electronically in a format specified by the Administrator. At this time, no alternative submission format has been provided. This raises a critical legal question: If the EPA indicates that reports do not need to be submitted, what is the risk for affected companies?

Although GHGRP requirements under 40 CFR Part 98 are not covered by Title V—and therefore do not require self-disclosure in compliance reports—the EPA still retains enforcement authority under Section 114 of the Clean Air Act. Historically, enforcement of GHGRP reporting has been minimal, and it is unlikely that the current administration would aggressively pursue penalties. However, as a precaution, companies may consider submitting their RY2024 GHGRP reporting forms via email to their EPA regional offices by the March 31 deadline to demonstrate good faith compliance, unless an extension is announced, or other instructions are provided by EPA in the meantime.

Broader Implications for GHG Disclosure

Regardless of the evolving federal regulatory landscape, many companies have additional drivers for disclosing their greenhouse gas emissions. While GHGRP calculations often serve as the basis for Scope 1 inventories, businesses should consider state-level reporting obligations, supply chain requirements, investor expectations, and voluntary sustainability commitments when determining their reporting strategies.

Given these factors, we recommend that companies:

  1. Continue preparing GHG emissions calculations to maintain internal consistency and compliance readiness.
  2. Monitor the EPA’s GHGRP website closely for real-time updates and further guidance.
  3. Evaluate alternative reporting mechanisms (such as direct email submissions to EPA regional offices) to ensure transparency and mitigate potential compliance risks.

Moving Forward

While the full impact of the EPA’s recent deregulatory announcement remains uncertain, companies should take a proactive approach to GHG reporting. Maintaining accurate emissions calculations and staying informed about regulatory developments will help organizations navigate this evolving landscape with confidence.

Stay tuned for further updates as the situation unfolds or contact Trinity Consultants directly to talk with a local expert.

I joined Trinity Consultants because I wanted to take my experience as an engineering student and apply it to a job that was people-oriented and allowed me to explore a wide range of industries. In my time at Trinity, I’ve had the opportunity to both work on a variety of projects and develop my own areas of expertise. As someone who was interested in air dispersion modeling early on, I’ve had the opportunity to grow my experience in that subject area without sacrificing opportunities to try new projects and work with great people. As a Senior Consultant, I now support clients in a variety of industries including data centers, surface coating, Portland cement, lime manufacturing, oil and gas, and more. My project work covers a broad range as well, including air dispersion modeling, routine compliance support, new construction permitting, and stack testing support.

Sam Najmolhoda
Senior Consultant

Related Resources

Navigating the Methane Emission Landscape
Navigating the Methane Emission Landscape
Read More
Deciphering the Complexity of PSM and RMP Regulations
Deciphering the Complexity of PSM and RMP Regulations
Read More
Must Read Tips for Your TRI Reporting
Must Read Tips for Your TRI Reporting
Read More
ACHD Proposed General Operating Permit for Concrete Batch Plants
ACHD Proposed General Operating Permit for Concrete Batch Plants
Read More
California enacts key legislation to extend AB 32 Cap-and-Trade Program through Calendar Year 2045
California enacts key legislation to extend AB 32 Cap-and-Trade Program through Calendar Year 2045
Read More

Related Upcoming Events