PSM Programs 101: Differences between NH3 Refrigeration and Chemical Manufacturing

Environmental ConsultingEnvironmental Consulting
02/20/2025
Share it with the world!

PSM Programs Are Not All Alike: Exploring the Nuances of Ammonia Refrigeration

Trinity Consultants experts have extensive experience implementing process safety management (PSM) programs in the industrial world. Let’s explore the differences between elements of PSM programs, such as the regulatory framework governing chemical manufacturers and ammonia refrigeration users, Recognized and Generally Accepted Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP), Emergency Response, Incident Investigation, and Management of Change practices.

The Chemical Manufacturing Landscape

In the world of chemical manufacturing (and hydrocarbon processing in general), the scale of operations is often vast, and the chemicals involved are often as diverse as they are hazardous. One of the major safety concerns here is the potential for an outdoor release of a flammable vapor cloud. Imagine this: a leak in a storage tank or during a transfer process where volatile organic compounds (VOCs) escape into the atmosphere. 
  • Hazards: Such a release could lead to a flammable cloud that, if ignited, could result in a catastrophic explosion. 
  • Regulatory Framework: Under OSHA’s PSM standard (29 CFR 1910.119), facilities must perform a Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) to identify such risks, implement preventive measures like vapor recovery systems, safety integrated systems, and have comprehensive emergency response plans. 
  • Environmental Impact: There’s also the concern for environmental contamination, which drives the need for strict monitoring and containment strategies.

Ammonia Refrigeration’s Challenges are Indoors

Switching gears to ammonia refrigeration systems, we’re looking at a different beast altogether. Here, the primary worry isn’t an explosion outside but rather an indoor toxic release of ammonia, although ammonia explosions can occur in confined areas.
  • Hazards: Ammonia is toxic and can be lethal in high concentrations. An indoor leak poses immediate health risks to workers, potentially leading to respiratory issues or worse.  
  • Regulatory and Standards Compliance: 
    • OSHA mandates under the PSM standard that facilities with over 10,000 pounds of ammonia must have robust safety programs. This includes leak detection systems, emergency ventilation, and evacuation plans.
    • The International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration (IIAR) complements this with specific standards. For instance, IIAR 6 covers the inspection, testing, and maintenance of ammonia leak detection systems, crucial for preventing and managing indoor releases.
  • Operational Safety: Existing ammonia refrigeration systems are subject to IIAR 9, which outlines a minimum safety standard for these systems.  This standard includes documentation standards, minimum system pressure ratings, emergency shutdown documentation, general equipment safety requirements, and requirements for ammonia detection systems and alarms.
  • Contrasting Safety Measures:
    • Training: Chemical manufacturers train for a wide range of scenarios, including vapor cloud management, while ammonia system operators focus on ammonia-specific hazards, safe handling, and emergency response to leaks.
    • Emergency Response: Chemical plants might have their own on-site emergency response crews (fire, hazmat, etc.) as well as rely on external fire departments for vapor cloud scenarios.  Ammonia refrigeration facilities are often more concerned with internal evacuation and neutralization with water to dilute ammonia in the air.  Ammonia refrigeration facilities may also be small and remote, and not have a full-scale, dedicated emergency response team.

RAGAGEP (Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practices)

  • Chemical Manufacturing:
    • Diversity: Chemical manufacturers deal with a wide array of substances, each with their own set of engineering practices. RAGAGEP might include standards from API, NFPA, or ASME, tailored to specific chemicals and processes.
    • Complexity: The focus is on preventing runaway reactions, managing pressure, and ensuring containment, which requires a broad knowledge base and complex engineering solutions.
  • Ammonia Refrigeration:
    • Specificity: Here, RAGAGEP is largely governed by IIAR standards (like IIAR 2 for design, IIAR 4 for installation) due to the singular focus on ammonia. 
    • Simplicity: While less complex than chemical manufacturing, the practices are highly specialized towards ammonia’s properties, focusing on leak prevention and system integrity.

Emergency Response

  • Chemical Manufacturing:
    • Scenario Diversity: Plans must account for fire, explosion, toxic release, and environmental impacts. This includes coordination with external emergency services, community notification systems, and sometimes, specialized equipment like foam systems for vapor cloud suppression.
    • Training: Extensive, scenario-based training is required, often involving drills with local emergency responders to manage the variety of potential incidents.
  • Ammonia Refrigeration:
    • Indoor Focus: The primary concern is an indoor ammonia leak, necessitating immediate evacuation, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and rapid neutralization with water sprays to dilute ammonia.
    • Training: Focuses on ammonia-specific hazards, with a strong emphasis on leak detection, containment, and evacuation procedures. Training often includes certification from bodies like IIAR.

Management of Change (MOC)

  • Chemical Manufacturing:
    • Complexity: Changes in processes, equipment, or chemicals require thorough MOC procedures due to potential interactions and cascading effects. Each change must be assessed for safety impacts, sometimes involving re-evaluations of Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) or updating safety data sheets.
    • Documentation: Requires extensive documentation to trace back decisions, ensuring compliance with regulations like OSHA’s PSM.
  • Ammonia Refrigeration:
    • Focused Approach: MOC in ammonia systems is more straightforward but no less critical, focusing on modifications to piping, equipment, or operational procedures that could affect ammonia containment.
    • Practicality: Changes often relate to equipment maintenance or system upgrades, with a strong emphasis on ensuring mechanical integrity post-change.

Incident Investigation

  • Chemical Manufacturing:
    • Broad Analysis: Investigations here aim to understand not just the immediate cause but also contributing factors across chemical processes, human factors, and system failures. 
    • Regulatory Scrutiny: Due to the potential for severe impacts, investigations might involve regulatory bodies, leading to industry-wide lessons learned.
  • Ammonia Refrigeration:
    • Ammonia-Centric: Incidents are investigated with a focus on ammonia’s behavior, looking at system failures, human error, or maintenance lapses. 
    • Immediate Action: There’s a strong push for quick corrective actions to prevent ammonia exposure, often leading to immediate changes in practice or equipment.

Conclusion

Both chemical manufacturers and ammonia refrigeration users want to develop PSM programs that help identify hazards and prevent accidents, but their approaches are tailored to the unique hazards they face. Chemical manufacturers guard against the explosive potential of outdoor vapor clouds, while ammonia refrigeration systems prioritize preventing and managing indoor toxic exposures. 

By understanding these differences, we can appreciate the complexity and necessity of industry-specific safety protocols. Whether you’re managing a chemical plant or an ammonia refrigeration system, the key lies in rigorous application of standards, continuous training, and proactive hazard management. 

I joined Trinity Consultants because I wanted to take my experience as an engineering student and apply it to a job that was people-oriented and allowed me to explore a wide range of industries. In my time at Trinity, I’ve had the opportunity to both work on a variety of projects and develop my own areas of expertise. As someone who was interested in air dispersion modeling early on, I’ve had the opportunity to grow my experience in that subject area without sacrificing opportunities to try new projects and work with great people. As a Senior Consultant, I now support clients in a variety of industries including data centers, surface coating, Portland cement, lime manufacturing, oil and gas, and more. My project work covers a broad range as well, including air dispersion modeling, routine compliance support, new construction permitting, and stack testing support.

Sam Najmolhoda
Senior Consultant

Related Resources

Preparing for Colorado’s Toxic Air Contaminant Report
Preparing for Colorado’s Toxic Air Contaminant Report
Read More
Expansions on Subpart W Emissions Tracking
Expansions on Subpart W Emissions Tracking
Read More
Prepare for the IRA: How to Get the Most Out of Your Data
Prepare for the IRA: How to Get the Most Out of Your Data
Read More
How does the IRA Methane Emission Reduction Program’s Waste Emissions Charge Impact the Oil & Gas Industry?
How does the IRA Methane Emission Reduction Program’s Waste Emissions Charge Impact the Oil & Gas Industry?
Read More
Complying with California’s Climate Accountability Package
Complying with California’s Climate Accountability Package
Read More

Related Upcoming Events

AEMA
Sep 19, 2025
AEMA
Read More
ASHP Midyear
Sep 19, 2025
ASHP Midyear
Read More
2025 UTA Oil & Gas Conference
Sep 19, 2025
2025 UTA Oil & Gas Conference
Read More
AAPS PharmSci
Sep 19, 2025
AAPS PharmSci
Read More