As the firm expanded investments across upstream oil and gas and energy transition assets, it sought to strengthen the rigor, consistency, and usefulness of sustainability information used to support portfolio management and investor communications. Operating companies varied significantly in size, maturity, data availability, and internal resources, resulting in differences in how sustainability metrics were defined, calculated, and reported.
At the same time, sustainability priorities differed across the two funds. While certain portfolio companies focused on operational performance indicators such as emissions, safety, and workforce metrics, others emphasized measures related to technology deployment, environmental impact, and growth. Aggregating information across diverse business models while maintaining consistency and comparability presented an ongoing challenge.
The firm sought a trusted advisor that could provide technical expertise, portfolio-level perspective, and year-round program support while serving as an extension of its lean internal sustainability team.